State Funding for the Arts
People support state funding for the arts to ensure that artists will create worthwhile projects that the marketplace cannot support. They feel that without public subsidies America will only produce commercialized garbage like comic books, sitcoms, and slasher movies designed only for the least common denominator audience. However, an understanding of how art is produced and how subsidies function can change these beliefs.
-
Commercial artists have created many of the world’s greatest masterpieces (Shakespeare’s plays, Dickens’ novels, and Verdi’s operas) for a popular audience
-
Private contributions make up the majority of art funding; they could easily take up the slack if public funding was eliminated
-
Yes, the marketplace often panders to the least common denominator, but the marketplace also produces diverse materials for niche markets. Look through Borders or Ebay, and see a variety of choices
-
Would you force opera lovers to subsidize monster truck fans? Then why would you force monster truck fans to support the opera?
-
Government funding means government interference, as private schools and colleges know. The same condition holds true for the arts
For More Information
Ten Good Reasons to Eliminate Funding
for the National Endowment for the Arts
Home |
General
Techniques |
Activist Organizations |
Affirmative Action |
All Purpose Answers |
Campaign
Finance |
Christians |
Civil
Rights Legislation |
College Students |
Drug
War |
Environment |
Foreign
Policy |
Funding for the Arts |
Gun Control |
Health Care |
Immigration |
Dealing with
Jerks |
Libertarianism/Libertarian
Party |
Minimum
Wage |
School
Choice |
Social
Security |
Speeches |
Talk Radio Tips |
Welfare |
Voting
Third Party |
Other Persuasion Information
|